
At David Burke’s Primehouse in Chicago, you can get a Manhattan made with leather-infused bourbon that includes a bitters-and-maraschino purée that becomes a gumdrop when placed in the glass. The Below Zero Nitro-Bar at the Miami Beach restaurant Barton G. features drinks frozen with liquid nitrogen—like the Classic Nitro-tini, with a swizzle stick made from frozen vermouth.
While it’s unlikely that the Margarita and the Martini will fall out of fashion, the merger of science and booze is a hot topic in the world of drinks. An offshoot of molecular gastronomy, the term coined by El Bulli chef Ferran Adrià, molecular mixology is the art of taking flavors we are used to ingesting in liquid form and turning them around so we get solid cocktails and alcoholic foams, sprays, and smoke—sensations we don’t typically associate with happy hour.
It’s a fine line between what works and what doesn’t in molecular gastronomy, as anyone who has experienced it at restaurants like Chicago’s Moto and Alinea or New York’s WD-50 can attest. There’s a certain intellectualization that doesn’t always result in tasty food. The same is true when science is applied to drinks.
Last fall in San Francisco, Plymouth gin organized a training session for local bartenders on the topic. Jason Crawley, an alcohol expert from Sydney, demonstrated such things as making caviar and foams, and freezing alcohol with liquid nitrogen (I burned my tongue on the supercooled gin and tonic). It was all good fun and a boost for creative energies, but little more.
Call me jaded, but there’s a ho-hum factor to all of this. Foams are so passé in the foodie world that they turn up in practically every joke made about El Bulli. And liquid nitrogen—well, who has the time and facilities? That’s the problem with these techniques. They take a lot of effort and prep, and you often end up with a somewhat predictable take on a drink we all know and love. When it comes time to order another round, most people find themselves craving the original, not another playful postmodern descendant.
But some people really are taking the molecular mixology tools at hand and emphasizing, refining, or improving flavor. That’s when it gets interesting. At Tailor in New York, head bartender Eben Freeman is making a drink named the Bazooka, which features a homemade bubblegum cordial, and one he calls the Asa Gohan, which pairs Grape-Nut-infused shochu with crazy milk nigori sake and a little raspberry syrup. It may sound equally as gimmicky as a Nitro-tini, but Freeman’s not just going for the shock factor: “I start with flavor ideas,” he told me. “The thing that interests me a lot which relates to, say, the bubblegum drink is the idea of sense memory, the idea that certain flavors really mean much more profound things to people in the form of deep, very personal connections. And if you’re able to capture a flavor that wasn’t in a liquid or cocktail form before, that’s really a key to opening up a broader and more penetrating experience of a drink.”
I love the idea of his root-beer rye: rye whiskey infused with sarsaparilla, sassafras, and licorice root. Root beer was my preferred childhood beverage, and I still drink it, especially when nursing a particularly grave hangover (it works). I’m more than happy to let cocktails encroach on my personal sense memory. But it’s easy to grow weary of the same old jokes.
What's with all this freezing? I think more drinks should be served on fire.
Let me say that I enjoy your column, and wish not to inject animosity into our discourse. However, while Adria and others (like Heston Blumenthal at the Fat Duck and Wylie Dufresne at wd~50) have popularized a cooking style often referred to in the media and in common parlance as "Molecular Gastronomy", they do not actually use that term.
From an article, "Statement on the New Cookery" by Adria,...+READ
Let me say that I enjoy your column, and wish not to inject animosity into our discourse. However, while Adria and others (like Heston Blumenthal at the Fat Duck and Wylie Dufresne at wd~50) have popularized a cooking style often referred to in the media and in common parlance as "Molecular Gastronomy", they do not actually use that term.
From an article, "Statement on the New Cookery" by Adria, Blumenthal, and others, appearing in The Guardian and at http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2006/dec/10/foodanddrink.obsfoodmonthly
"The fashionable term "molecular gastronomy" was introduced relatively recently, in 1992, to name a particular academic workshop for scientists and chefs on the basic food chemistry of traditional dishes. That workshop did not influence our approach, and the term "molecular gastronomy" does not describe our cooking, or indeed any style of cooking."
Molecular Gastronomy as an academic study is still fairly young and nebulous, and requires sustained interaction and discourse between scientists, chefs, and writers and examiners of culture such as yourself. Its culinary cousin and partner in exploration, experimental cuisine, lacks an accurate popular name; but I hope that the pitfalls inherent in any novel practice do not put you off too much from what is an exciting and vibrant subject for consumption and exploration.-COLLAPSE
You're right about This. Herve This appears to have coined it, while Adria popularized it. Thanks for the the point of distinction.
"Molecular Gastronomy" was not coined by Ferran Adria; it is commonly misused to describe his style of cuisine but was actually originated by Herve This, a French scientist, to describe, literally, molecular gastronomy, the chemical/scientific understanding of food and eating.
Since Adria, Dufresne, et al produce food and not knowledge, they are not gastronomists, and their production focuses...+READ
"Molecular Gastronomy" was not coined by Ferran Adria; it is commonly misused to describe his style of cuisine but was actually originated by Herve This, a French scientist, to describe, literally, molecular gastronomy, the chemical/scientific understanding of food and eating.
Since Adria, Dufresne, et al produce food and not knowledge, they are not gastronomists, and their production focuses not on molecular but on macroscopic properties of food. So, "Molecular Gastronomy" doesn't technically describe what they do at all, either.
The drinks sound cool, though.-COLLAPSE