Memories of Philippine Kitchens
By Romy Dorotan and Amy Besa
Stewart, Tabori & Chang, 2006; $35
Think you know sour? You don’t know sour, unless you know the food of the Philippines: the kalamansi lime, the kamias fruit used in ceviche-like seafood combos called kinilaw, the tamarind-soured sinigang soup, the fruit vinegars made with wild guava, with coconut, with cashew. I still don’t know most of these flavors, but I have a better grasp of the uses of sourness thanks to Memories of Philippine Kitchens, by Romy Dorotan and Amy Besa, the couple that own New York’s Cendrillon restaurant. From the book, I cooked the mellow-sour chicken adobo, which was softened by soy sauce and coconut milk (see recipe below); the pickle-sour achara, a handy green-papaya condiment as comfortable on hot dogs as it is with Philippine fare; and the just-shy-of-brutishly-sour squid adobo, blackened with squid ink, peppered with jalapeƱos, and tarted up with a whole cup of red wine vinegar. Of course, Philippine food isn’t just sour, it’s sweet and bitter and savory and salty too, but the diversity of sourness described in the book gives a sense of what we’re missing when we overlook the food of the Philippines.
It’s astounding that we don’t yet know Philippine food better—there are far more Filipino Americans in this country than Thai Americans, but you wouldn’t know it from the restaurant listings in the phone book. Philippine fare seems to be one of those cuisines that are just better expressed in home kitchens. To this day I still covet another pass at the jaw-dropping banquet that my high school friend Bob’s family prepared for his graduation party: a wall of lumpia, a vat of adobo, a mountain of spicy crabs. Dorotan and Besa, who are married, opened Cendrillon in SoHo in 1995. They had individually left their native Philippines in the early years of the oppressive Marcos government (1965 to 1986), and met as Temple University graduate students before settling in New York in 1979. Originally, Cendrillon had a more general pan-Asian approach, but as time went on, the couple focused more on trademark Philippine dishes.
In their book, Dorotan and Besa don’t just describe the food that they make in the restaurant or dig up family recipes. They revisit the islands, seeking stellar home cooks in different regions to learn how and what they cook. Although much of the book is devoted to the canonical dishes of Philippine cuisine—the adobos, the spring-roll-like lumpia, the stir-fried noodle pancits, the sweet and cheesy rice cake bibingka, the pig, whole and in parts—the impression one gets is of a somewhat unmasterable cuisine that varies from region to region, town to town, cook to cook. No doubt this is true of all cuisines, but there is something about Philippine cookery that seems particularly ineffable—at least when one confronts the sheer volume of information in Dorotan and Besa’s book. “Filipinos,” the authors write, “are as likely to agree that adobo should be considered the national dish of the Philippines, as they’re liable to disagree on every other point about its preparation and enjoyment.”
That slipperiness has something to do with history. The Philippine kitchens of the title—notice the plural—have many, many sources for their flavors. There are the traditions of the earliest settlers (the kinilaw, and the soured stews like adobo and sinigang), the Chinese influence (noodles, spring rolls, and ducks), and the Spanish influence. The Philippines were “a colony of a colony,” overseen by the Mexican bureaucracy rather than Madrid, so the influences were both old world and new: paella-like dishes, pork sausages, tomatoes, and chiles. Then, of course, there is the American presence—the Philippines were an American territory for more than four decades after the Spanish-American War. The U.S. food legacy? Desserts, for one. In addition to providing a recipe for banana cream pie, Dorotan and Besa write that chiffon cake remains the favorite cake in the Philippines and include a recipe for one with jackfruit icing. They also say that the American influence served to glamorize prepared foods—Spam, Vienna sausages, and fruit cocktail—over perishables.
Regionalism is layered upon those multinational influences. In the Ilocos region, bagoong monamon, the fermented seafood paste used in the vegetable medley pinakbet, is popular. From Quezon province comes a kind of barbecued coconut milk, extracted from coconut flesh that’s been charred by a live coal. For an outsider like me, one can get a little lost amid the book’s definitions, oral histories, recipes, and travelogue, but it’s a pleasant kind of disorientation, made more so by Neal Oshima’s lively photos. Each time I dip into the book, I find recipes I must try: their version of longaniza, boar sausage laced with lime zest and annatto; a salad of salted duck eggs and tomatoes, the Philippine answer to caprese salad; or Dorotan’s more high-style dish of coffee and coconut-milk-roasted pompano.
Despite their thoroughness, Dorotan and Besa also have limits. Not everything can be re-created outside the Philippines. They describe, but give no how-to, for lechon, the whole roasted pig, and the pair have given up, for now, on a recipe for puto, the steamed rice cakes eaten for dessert, which “came out like a brick every time we tried to experiment with it.” Thanks to their good judgment, the dishes I did try all came out well, including the adobos I mentioned earlier; a fragrant rice pilaf with turmeric, mushrooms, and bamboo shoots; and a nifty annatto-laced quick cure for pork shoulder “bacon.” On top of that, most of the recipes—with some notable exceptions, like the pancit—have less-arduous shopping lists than some other Southeast Asian dishes I’ve taken on in the past.
It’s still a bit of a mystery why Philippine food has not been more embraced in the U.S. (why, for that matter, are there not more Indonesian and Moroccan restaurants?). But Dorotan and Besa give a newfound impetus to explore it at home—where, with a future squid adobo, I can pull back a bit on the vinegar, and no one will question my dish’s authenticity.
The recipe below, for chicken adobo, has relatively few annotations, because it was as simple as pie.
Chicken Adobo
Serves 4 to 6
Marinade: 1 1/2 cups rice vinegar {No guava or coconut vinegar here—too bad for the part of me looking for an exotic sour, but the rice vinegar is mercifully easy to find and packs a gentler acidity than others. If you are seeking a fruity vinegar to experiment with, there is a groovy recipe for pineapple-infused vinegar in the book.}
1 cup coconut milk {This also softens the sour blow.}
1/4 cup soy sauce {A decidedly Chinese influence.}
12 garlic cloves, peeled {That’s a lot, but the dish is stewed, so it’s not harsh.}
3 bay leaves {A Spanish note, no doubt.}
3 whole birdseye chiles {Spanish again, via the New World. Notice that the chiles are kept whole—Philippine cuisine generally packs less capsicum heat than other cuisines in Southeast Asia.}
1 1/2 teaspoons freshly ground black pepper
One 3 1/2-pound whole chicken, quartered and cut into pieces
1. In a large, nonreactive bowl or heavy-duty, resealable plastic bag, combine all of the marinade ingredients. Add the chicken pieces and turn to coat in the marinade. {I found the rather acidic marinade a little freaky, as if I were making chicken ceviche, but the resulting stew isn’t tough.} Refrigerate for at least 2 hours or overnight.
2. In a large casserole or Dutch oven, heat the chicken and marinade over high heat. Bring to a boil, then reduce the heat and simmer, stirring occasionally to make sure the chicken is covered in the marinade, until the chicken is cooked through and tender, 20 to 25 minutes.
3. Transfer the chicken pieces to a large bowl, raise the heat to medium-high, and reduce the sauce until it has the consistency of heavy cream, about 5 minutes. Remove the bay leaves and chiles. Return the chicken to the sauce and cook until just warmed through. {Though it doesn’t take long to cook, this is one of those leave-it-around dishes that gets better with time. Do not hesitate to let it sit in the refrigerator and make a midweek meal of it. The resulting taste is not dissimilar from Thai tom ka gai—less perfumed, perhaps, without the lime leaves, lemongrass, and galangal, but powerfully satisfying in its own way.}
The real reason why Philippine cuisine hasn't gained steam in the mainstream is the lack of Filipino restaurateurs in the U.S. and other countries. There are surprisingly very few Philippine restaurants that do not follow the traditional model of "turo turo" where food is presented cafeteria style. That style just doesn't fly especially with caucasians. Presentation is also not focused on that...+READ
The real reason why Philippine cuisine hasn't gained steam in the mainstream is the lack of Filipino restaurateurs in the U.S. and other countries. There are surprisingly very few Philippine restaurants that do not follow the traditional model of "turo turo" where food is presented cafeteria style. That style just doesn't fly especially with caucasians. Presentation is also not focused on that much, and oftentimes, dishes aren't cooked authentically or are made haphazardly. These more than anything else are preventing Filipino food from becoming mainstream in North America. Anyone who is knowledgeable of Philippine cuisine would know that its flavors are diverse, exotic, yet accessible and flexible at the same time. Sarah cahracterized the cuisine as "unmasterable" and to some extent that is true because of its incredible diversity owing to numerous foreign influences and inherent regionalism. As such the cusine can also be characterized as fragmented and can be a mystery even to Filipinos themselves. The only way to experience Philippine cuisine in my opinion is to go to the Philippines and its many regions and provinces. A common misconception is that Philippine cuisine isn't spicy enough. That's where regionalism comes in. Want spicy? Go to the Bicol region. Some people also say that it doesn't have strong flavors. To some extent that is true. Philippine cuisine does not overspice nor overseason. Balance is key. Flavors are not necessarily strong where one flavor dominates. Instead, flavors are bold but well rounded.
Sara mentioned that sourness is a key element to many Filipino dishes. That is true and it makes sense because the Philippines is a hot and humid country. Sourness awakens the tastebuds and stimulates appetite especially in the heat. Another characteristic of Philippine cuisine is the prevalence of desserts and sweetstuffs. Compared to other Asian countries, especially those in East and Southeast Asia, the Philippines has an astounding proprensity for sweet things. This shouldn't be surprising because the country has been influenced by Europe (chiefly through Spain) and North America (the U.S.) for a long time.
Simply put, Philippine cuisine is a cornucopia of flavors largely undiscovered outside the country's borders. Only recently has there been a drive towards introducing the cuisine to the rest of the world. It's not surprising that this movement closely follows the resurgence of national pride and patriotism that has been developing in the the Philippines the past few years. Hopefully we see more good restaurants opened in the future, and more books like this one written to educate people and preserve traditional recipes and methods of Philippine cuisine.-COLLAPSE
i love the fact that you have reviewed this posting. i'm glad that you pointed out the different influences in our cuisine... i am filipino (or pilipina) and i would have to somewhat agree that there is a lack of decent filipino restaurants. i think that fact has to deal with the fact that people may not be willing to try or are not used to the extreme flavors. also, i'm guessing that some...+READ
i love the fact that you have reviewed this posting. i'm glad that you pointed out the different influences in our cuisine... i am filipino (or pilipina) and i would have to somewhat agree that there is a lack of decent filipino restaurants. i think that fact has to deal with the fact that people may not be willing to try or are not used to the extreme flavors. also, i'm guessing that some filipino restaurants weaken their food in order to satisfy mainstream america. filipino food actually has some pretty strong flavors adn the reviewer stated, delicious sinigang is characterized by the sourness of the stock (somewhat similar to tom yum soup flavors). there are different types of pancit: pancit canton, pancit bihon, pancit palabok, pancit malabon, etc. the term "pancit" loosely describes the dish as a noodle dish. pancit palabok has heavy shrimp flavoring, and actually is gravy over rice noodles. salt is also a big part of cuisine, including bagoong (salted shrimp paste), itlog na pula, bangus... there are a lot of filipinos in so. cal., i hope you will have better experiences =)-COLLAPSE
Hello, btw. A note on spellings. The word "Filipino/a" is used to describe the person. "Philippine" is used to describe the culture or something of the Philippines. Cheers!
Wow, I actually recently blogged about this very cookbook, and this same adobo recipe (http://burntlumpia.typepad.com). It's a great cookbook all around, I think I am just used to my mother's cooking though.
I've had quite a bit of home-cooked Philippino food prepared by co-workers, as well as some restaurant food, here in SoCal. While some of it is nice (pancit probably my favorite), it isn't especially memorable because the flavorings are not strong. I'm not surprised that restaurants don't thrive or even survive unless in areas with a high population of Philippinos.