Frankensteak on the Menu

Last week scientists, environmentalists, and food industry folks met in Norway to talk about the future of our steak and how it just might come from a test tube, at the In Vitro Meat Symposium. The issues at hand are a rising global middle class that threatens to double meat consumption rates by 2050, as well as the environmental impact of raising meat.

But meat grown in a test tube? The whole thing just seems creepy. It may, however, be the steak of the future. According to Wired magazine:

Rapidly evolving technology and increasing concern about the environmental impact of meat production are signs that vat-grown meat is moving from scientific curiosity to consumer option. In vitro meat production is a specialized form of tissue engineering, a biomedical practice in which scientists try to grow animal tissues like bone, skin, kidneys and hearts. Proponents say it will ultimately be a more efficient way to make animal meat, which would reduce the carbon footprint of meat products.

Just for clarification’s sake: We’re not talking about growing an entire animal (“75 to 95 percent of what we feed an animal is lost,” a Johns Hopkins researcher claims). Nope, they’d just be growing your dinner meat. Somehow they’d “get cells to grow as if they were inside a living animal.”

Minus the animal.

The article does admit that “None of the experts were sure if there is a large market of early adopters who want to eat test tube meat for environmental, health or ethical reasons.”

I can’t imagine why.

POST A COMMENT |2 Comments

COMMENT

  • I heard about this several years ago and was skeptical. I still am, but am glad to see it's still a viable rumor, because I love it! I am generally for medical bioengineering and against agricultural biotech, but this one gets my vote. Anything that hurts less innocent animals is ok by me! And chances are that it will be bioengineered to have less cholesterol and other harmful substances found in...+READ

    I heard about this several years ago and was skeptical. I still am, but am glad to see it's still a viable rumor, because I love it! I am generally for medical bioengineering and against agricultural biotech, but this one gets my vote. Anything that hurts less innocent animals is ok by me! And chances are that it will be bioengineered to have less cholesterol and other harmful substances found in animal flesh.-COLLAPSE

  • One stat I've heard on cultured meat is that it costs $1 million for a kilo. My meat professor is convinced that we will be able to buy ground meat from this process in five years.