I have a theory about wine descriptors—you know, all those ridiculously precise flavors that wine reviewers always claim to taste in every bottle and that most wine consumers read only as fodder for exasperated jokes. Saddle leather, cocoa (as opposed to dark chocolate), blueberry syrup (as opposed to fresh blueberries), and so on. I’ve always been as put off by that stuff as everybody else, and I’ve also wondered why on earth reviewers think it passes as meaningful wine-reviewing language. Generally speaking, I’m convinced that it’s a kind of intellectual practice that captivates hard-core wine geeks: Hey, let’s see just how many flavors we can perceive in a single mouthful. I’m also convinced that the substitution of this talk for actual communication can be blamed on the fact that it’s a whole lot easier than trying to generate a true impression of a wine. The reviewer knows that flavor-labeling trick, in other words, so he trots it out for show.
I’ve also been inclined, also generally speaking, to share a complaint that I believe comes from Hugh Johnson: to wit, that such talk makes wine sound like so much fruit salad.
But now it occurs to me that the fruit salad complaint actually contains its own retort. Litanies of descriptors make wine sound like fruit salad because our minds are primarily visual. So when somebody lists a bunch of fruit, you just picture fruit; you don’t spontaneously taste it. For example: I opened a sensational bottle of Paxton McLaren Vale Shiraz the other night, and then I read some tasting notes that declared it to have licorice-scented blackberry and pepper. Notes for a prior vintage included claims of leather and meat and cherries. And when I read all of those nouns, my mind’s natural reflex was to do what it always does when confronted with nouns: picture the objects in question. Needless to say, this isn’t very helpful in getting a sense of how a wine tastes.
And this is where my theory leads to a potential practice: If you subvert your mind’s natural imaging reflex, and let each word conjure instead the appropriate taste and smell, then wine descriptors can actually become useful. Holding each descriptor in your mental mouth, and indulging in its conjured flavor, and layering also the next word/flavor alongside, you really can begin to generate a mental approximation of whatever the reviewer was trying to communicate. It certainly doesn’t make a Paxton Shiraz taste any better—no words could possibly add anything to such a luscious deep-purple mouthful—but it absolutely leads the way to making sense of wine reviews.
the truth is, wine descriptors are a language which was standardized at UC-Davis in the 90's. It's a way for people in the wine industry to talk about wine in an apples to apples way. If you're experienced with what licorice, blackberry, and pepper flavors are like in a Shiraz, then this label is telling you what you can expect. If not, then it might as well be written in Latin. While some...+READ
the truth is, wine descriptors are a language which was standardized at UC-Davis in the 90's. It's a way for people in the wine industry to talk about wine in an apples to apples way. If you're experienced with what licorice, blackberry, and pepper flavors are like in a Shiraz, then this label is telling you what you can expect. If not, then it might as well be written in Latin. While some flavors can be very obvious, you probably won't literally taste blackberry as you would if you ate one fresh.
Unfortunately, descriptors have been abused because of the very thing written about here. Mention fresh blueberries, and you get an image. something between your head and your wallet associates that bottle with your love of fresh blueberries and you're more likely to buy it.
While wine writers can seem overly poetic sometimes, it's more informative to describe the leather/coffee/blackberry flavors than to call a wine hedonistic, balanced, or structured...descriptors which are subjective based on your threshold and tolerance for acidity, tannin, etc. and don't give you the whole picture.
...wine is a beautiful and complex thing, ignore the jibberjabber and just enjoy it.-COLLAPSE
What the heck is licorice-scented blackberry? You mean the notes listed it as though it were a thing in itself, instead of just listing the 2 components separately?
I always kind of suspected wine jargon was more about poetic license, giving an impressionistic rather than literal interpretation. Without that sort of freedom, writers are stuck with the same 9 or 10 words to describe each wine....+READ
What the heck is licorice-scented blackberry? You mean the notes listed it as though it were a thing in itself, instead of just listing the 2 components separately?
I always kind of suspected wine jargon was more about poetic license, giving an impressionistic rather than literal interpretation. Without that sort of freedom, writers are stuck with the same 9 or 10 words to describe each wine. Wine writers are, after all, wine WRITERS, and there are only so many ways to describe fruit flavors without using a little creativity. Food writers have it a little easier but not much.-COLLAPSE